freakystrong: (Ponder)
Equius Zahhak ([personal profile] freakystrong) wrote in [community profile] thoughtformed2013-04-05 09:39 pm

(no subject)

D --> I am a bit confused as to the purpose of this world
D --> Or even where e%actly it is located
D --> I presume this is another dream bubble, but it seems to be overrun by humans
D --> None of whom appear to be the humans I am semi-familiar with
D --> And I must admit, it angers me to be called fictional
D --> Being dead does not alter the state of one’s realness
D --> Also, what is this sch001feeding the humans are speaking of
D --> I am no wiggler, I do not need to be sch001fed
D --> I am, in fact considerably older than I 100k
D --> Possibly
D --> I would appreciate an e%planation, as I have been forbidden to smash any more things
notdogmatic: (big eyes small mouth)

[personal profile] notdogmatic 2013-04-09 03:01 pm (UTC)(link)
Courtesy does not seem to be a concern.

Why is it foolish?
notdogmatic: (Default)

[personal profile] notdogmatic 2013-04-10 03:45 pm (UTC)(link)
That may be true in our universes of origin. Here, however, there appears to be scientific support to the notional becoming material. Whether or not this is what occurred to us is subject to debate, but it is plainly possible.
notdogmatic: (lipbiting)

[personal profile] notdogmatic 2013-04-11 03:47 pm (UTC)(link)
The continued appearance and disappearance of a variety of creatures and phenomena, many seemingly impossible, some endemic to our former homes, has contributed a great deal of supporting evidence to this theory.
notdogmatic: (lipbiting)

[personal profile] notdogmatic 2013-04-13 02:58 pm (UTC)(link)
I am not a scientist. Either is plausible. But I do not believe the fiction theory is foolish.
notdogmatic: (lipbiting)

[personal profile] notdogmatic 2013-04-15 01:27 pm (UTC)(link)
If so, it is remarkably inefficient.
notdogmatic: (Default)

[personal profile] notdogmatic 2013-04-17 02:12 pm (UTC)(link)
That is an error. Many people have attempted to leave. However, their failures are anticlimactic.
notdogmatic: (looking to the future)

[personal profile] notdogmatic 2013-04-18 04:43 pm (UTC)(link)
They remain here, unable to depart.

The forcefield seems impenetrable. We were told a meteorite impact powerful enough to depopulate the planet would lower it; however, that may simply be because its projection apparatus would be damaged.
notdogmatic: (Default)

[personal profile] notdogmatic 2013-04-23 01:19 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes.